-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/chipra-final-report_0.pdf
February 21, 2016 - We encourage
readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … information from Illinois, Maine, Oregon, and Pennsylvania, the NET developed a
manuscript (under review … collective effort from many
stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff
underscores … We believe that future grant programs with similar goals should include review criteria in the
grant
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/highlight01.html
March 01, 2019 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management … due to Cindy Brach and Stacy Farr at AHRQ, Karen Llanos at CMS, and our colleagues for their careful review … Highlight and the time they spent answering many questions during our site visits, as well as their review
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/improvement-guide/1-about/index.html
February 01, 2020 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management … When you review your options, keep these considerations in mind:
Appropriateness for your organization … How quickly you need to see results: As you review your options, consider the immediate and long-term
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/news/newsletters/e-newsletter/904.html
March 01, 2024 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management … A systematic integrative review of specialized nurses' role to establish a culture of patient safety: … Review additional new publications in PSNet’s current issue or access recent cases and commentaries
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/chronic/chipra-088-fullreport.pdf
January 05, 2017 - ADHD Guidelines Review (Section 5, Attachment 4). … Review criteria for inclusion: age, date of diagnosis.
4. … Review and document measure elements in the ADHD Measures Chart Abstraction Tool.
7. … The evidence tables were then presented to the committee for expert review. … The data sources for reporting this measure are through review of patients’ EHRs.
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/howtogetstarted/How_to_Use_Guide_508.docx
April 05, 2013 - Assess your hospital’s needs and capabilities
Review your hospital’s strategic plan. … Review quality information and data related to core hospital processes. … Review the Guide Strategies
After assessing your hospital’s needs and capabilities, review the strategies … Implementation Checklist
Assess your hospital’s needs and capabilities
Review the hospital’s strategic … and families
Identify which strategies are the best fit for your hospital’s needs
and capabilities
Review
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/acute/chipra-206-fullreport.pdf
November 01, 2019 - Measure Owner
The Quality Measurement, Evaluation, Testing, Review, and Implementation Consortium (Q- … Q-METRIC expert panel concluded that this measure has a high degree of face validity
through a detailed review … generally are available, although collecting them may require a restricted-use agreement and
Institutional Review … If there is any information about this measure that is important for
the review process but has not … Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: A
systematic review.
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/acute/chipra-203-fullreport.pdf
April 10, 2017 - The measure will be a chart review performed to determine the proportion of patients for whom
an initial … review measure was high,
with 98 percent of patients meeting the measure. … This clinical performance of the chart review measure was high across all groups, with 97
percent of … Chart Review Limitations
Chart review measures can be time consuming, and institutions may not have … Preventing pressure ulcers: A systematic review. JAMA 2006;
296:974-84.
Reed K, May R.
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/improvement-guide/6-strategies-for-improving/access/strategy6a-openaccess.html
March 01, 2020 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/data/apcd/confrpt.html
February 01, 2018 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management … Because of the late notice secondary to the delayed grant review approval, several States were not able
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section1.html
March 01, 2019 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/statesummaries/nm-statesum.pdf
July 01, 2015 - interviews
conducted with staff in New Mexico and
Colorado agencies and participating SBHCs
and a review
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/highlight10.html
August 01, 2014 - Staff Contacts
Training & Education Funding
Grant Application, Review … Important Dates
AHRQ Tips for Grant Applicants
Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
Application Receipt & Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
Award Process
Post-Award Grant Management
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/chronic/chipra-0232-fullreport.pdf
February 01, 2020 - Measure Owner
The Quality Measurement, Evaluation, Testing, Review, and Implementation Consortium (Q- … Documentation, as determined by medical record review, must include, at a minimum, a note
containing … A 2011
systematic review reports a significant association between child and adolescent
overweight/ … Combining these two groups, medical records were requested for review for 1,124
(402+722) children. … Any differences were remedied by review of the chart.
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/acute/chipra-243-fullreport.pdf
August 01, 2019 - Measure Owner
The Quality Measurement, Evaluation, Testing, Review, and Implementation Consortium (Q- … A review of the literature
reveals that childhood malignancies have been increasing slightly for the … Q-METRIC expert panel concluded that this measure has a high degree of face validity
through a detailed review … If there is any information about this measure that is important for
the review process but has not
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/chronic/chipra-0242-fullreport.pdf
February 01, 2020 - Measure Owner
The Quality Measurement, Evaluation, Testing, Review, and Implementation Consortium (Q- … A 2011
systematic review reports a significant association between child and adolescent
overweight/ … Combining these two groups, medical records were requested for review for
1,124 (402+722) children. … Any differences
were remedied by review of the chart. … If there is any information about this measure that is important for
the review process but has not
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/chronic/chipra-141-fullreport.pdf
July 01, 2017 - Identifying a Gold Standard Population: Classifying Children by Medical
Complexity Using Medical Record Review … blinded to CRG categorization made assignments into one of three
levels of medical complexity through review … If there is any information about this measure that is important for
the review process but has not
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/perinatal/chipra-0083-fullreport.pdf
March 01, 2016 - Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic
review. JAMA 2005; 293(17):2141-8.
3.B. … A JAMA article described a systematic evidence review of the best evidence available on
maternal outcomes … Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic
review. JAMA 2005; 293(17):2141-8. … The use of episiotomy in obstetrical care: a
systematic review. … If there is any information about this measure that is important for
the review process but has not
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/outcomes/chipra-081-fullreport.pdf
April 01, 2019 - Discussion of Literature Review Findings
Children with Medicaid were less likely to be in excellent … The literature review provides support
for a linkage between insurance and self-assessed health. … NHIS Analyses
Our literature review identified the annual National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) as … Parents subsequently were given an opportunity to review the PGH-7 and were asked to
comment on their … Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community
studies.
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/acute/chipra-143-section-5a-evidence-table.pdf
January 01, 2014 - Computer review required 20 percent as
much time (11 person-hours/week) as chart
review did (55 person-hours … Each record took an average of 40 minutes
to review. … Review of each
record was capped at 20 minutes. … The NICU trigger tool resulted in a median
chart review time of 15 minutes, a mean
chart review time … AEs were identified
using a two stage review process.